In 1802, the United States embarked on a transformative journey, marking the year with significant strides in military education, judicial reform, and territorial expansion, reflecting its growing infrastructure and commitment to foundational institutions.
The establishment of the United States Military Academy at West Point stood out as a monumental advancement in American military education. Located strategically along the Hudson River in New York, West Point was founded with the mission to offer comprehensive training in engineering, military strategy, and leadership. This initiative was part of a broader effort to professionalize the military, ensuring that future leaders were well-equipped to meet the challenges of defense and leadership. Over the years, West Point has upheld its commitment to excellence, producing distinguished military leaders who have significantly influenced the nation's history.
Parallel to the advancements in military education, the Judiciary Act of 1802, enacted on April 29, heralded a significant reorganization of the federal court system. This act was a response to the evolving needs of an expanding nation, aiming to streamline legal proceedings and enhance the accessibility of justice. By adjusting the structure and jurisdiction of the courts, the act facilitated a more efficient legal process, reinforcing the judiciary's essential role in American governance. This restructuring was crucial in adapting the federal judiciary to the complexities of a growing United States, ensuring its ability to uphold laws and administer justice effectively across a diversifying populace.
The territorial integrity and expansion of the United States also witnessed a remarkable leap forward with the Enabling Act of 1802, passed on April 30. This legislation laid the groundwork for the formation of Ohio from the Northwest Territory, setting a structured precedent for the admission of states into the Union. Ohio's admission as the 17th state on March 1, 1803, not only signified the physical growth of the nation but also highlighted its expanding economic and political influence. The strategic importance of westward expansion became a central theme in the national narrative, underscoring the significance of territorial growth in the United States' evolution.
Furthermore, the appointment of William Thornton as the first superintendent of the United States Patent Office on June 1 emphasized the nation's commitment to fostering innovation and protecting intellectual property rights. Thornton's leadership played a pivotal role in establishing a conducive environment for technological advancement and economic growth, highlighting the government's recognition of innovation as a key driver of American progress. This commitment to innovation and intellectual property rights was instrumental in propelling the nation towards global leadership in technological advancements and economic dominance.
Together, these developments in 1802 laid the foundational pillars for America's future, integrating military prowess, legal integrity, territorial expansion, and innovation into the fabric of its identity and governance.
(1796-1807)
At no other time in American history was the one cent coin so important as it was in the closing years of the 18th century. Although cumbersome, the large copper coins were useful for very small transactions, unlike the wide variety of foreign coins then in circulation. Yet the Mint’s ability to create dies and procure quality copper for these vital coins was hampered by inadequate machinery, inexperienced employees and lack of funds, not to mention frequent epidemics of yellow fever. It often cost more to produce a coin than its face value. Though these failings could be explained as the growing pains of a new enterprise, Congress on several occasions almost gave up on the business of making coins and considered turning the matter over to private companies.
The young Mint was frequently attacked as inefficient. Actually, if one were to characterize the early years of the Philadelphia facility, the words “blunder” and “disaster” might come to mind. Along with a multitude of production difficulties, adequate supplies of copper were also a problem. The metal was mostly purchased in the form of planchets or blanks, but the domestic supply was inferior and resulted in dark, rough flans described as “black copper” by the Mint. Full of impurities, coins minted from this metal were of poor quality and wore rapidly. As a result, most of the copper supply had to be imported, primarily from the Boulton & Watt Company of Liverpool, England.
The denomination began with the design by Henry Voight in 1793, a flowing haired Liberty with a chain of fifteen links on the reverse. Almost immediately, objections were raised to the chain design, as it symbolized slavery and domination rather than the image of unity that Voight intended. A wreath quickly took its place. Later in 1793, Joseph’s Wright’s Liberty Cap design, borrowed from Dupré’s Libertas Americana medal, replaced the wild haired Liberty of the earlier pieces. Both Robert Scot and John Smith Gardner contributed variations of this design until a new motif was adopted in July of 1796.
Scot’s new Draped Bust design was modeled after a drawing by artist Gilbert Stuart. It depicts Liberty with flowing hair, a ribbon behind her head and drapery at her neckline. The inscription LIBERTY is above the bust and the date below. The reverse features the denomination ONE CENT, encircled by an open wreath of two olive branches tied with a bow. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA surrounds the wreath, and the fraction 1/100 is between the ends of the bow.
There are three varieties of reverses; each varies the leaves and berries on the wreath. They are known as the “Type of 1794,” “Type of 1795” or “Type of 1797.” All three types were used on the reverse of 1796 cents, with the latter two types on the 1797. The last reverse remained constant on the dates through 1807.
Since the lettering was punched into the dies by hand, errors abound. Among these are blunders such as the “LIHERTY” error where the “B” was rotated 180 degrees before being punched and then crudely corrected, or the “T” over “Y” blunder in 1802. Other variations involve the spacing and positioning of the lettering and date. Reverse errors include the wrong fraction, 1/000; a corrected fraction; the 2nd “T” in STATES or the “U” in UNITED punched inverted, then corrected; a large fraction punched over a small fraction and a stemless wreath.
Over 16 million Draped Bust large cents were made between 1796 and 1807. Although replete with many scarce varieties, the series has one particularly rare date, 1799. First popularized by early 19th century collector Joseph Mickley’s search for his birth year coin, the 1799 issue has achieved fame among large cent devotees. Although the mintage was relatively high, they are elusive in all grades. One story relating to their short supply opines that thousands of 1799 dated cents destined for tribal chiefs in exchange for slaves were lost at sea while being shipped to Africa by a Salem, Massachusetts company.
Because coin collecting wasn’t popular until the 1850’s, coins of this era were typically saved by mere chance. When copper was scarce or very high-priced, craftsmen or others who worked with the metal would buy kegs of copper cents to melt. The large cents also found use as home medical remedies, hotel key fobs and mechanical devices. Notched large cents were also used as a means of identification for runaway slaves on the way north.
Some unopened kegs survived and became the source of uncirculated specimens. One group of survivors came from a bag of one thousand pieces bought by Senator Benjamin Goodhue for his daughters around 1798. Preserved for several generations, they were sold in 1863 by David Nichols of Gallows Hill, near Salem, Massachusetts. Most of the Mint State cents from 1796-97 come from this “Nichols Hoard.”
As the popularity of coin collecting grew, a cottage industry developed both on and off the Mint premises to reproduce scarce dates. Around 1858, the rare date 1804 Draped Bust cent was “restruck” in copper using dies sold as scrap metal by the Mint. These restrikes can easily be distinguished from the originals as they exhibit evidence of tooling to correct flaws in the badly rusted dies. Other restrikes and uniface examples of this date are known in white metal.
Large cent specialists often try to acquire as many varieties as possible. The guide for this endeavor is in the works of Dr. William H. Sheldon, Early American Cents and the update published in 1958 called Penny Whimsy. General collectors seek large cents by design type. A representative collection would include only seven coins: The Chain cent of 1793, the Wreath cent of 1793, the Liberty Cap (1793-96), the Draped Bust (1796-1807), the Classic Head (1808-1814), the Coronet Head (1816-1839) and the Braided Hair (1839-57).
Draped Bust large cents suffer from some of the peculiar characteristics and problems of early coins. It is not unusual to see clipped planchets and uneven striking. Often the denomination ONE CENT is very weak, even on uncirculated pieces.
When grading this design, the points to first show wear on the obverse are the hair above the forehead, the hair above the ear and shoulder and the lines of the draped bustline. On the reverse, look for wear on the leaves of the olive branches and the knot of the ribbon.
The Draped Bust design was replaced in 1808 with the introduction of the “Classic Head” motif by the new Second Engraver, John Reich. The new design was concurrent with an improvement in die steel allowing, for the first time, an unprecedented 300,000 impressions per working die.
Coin Descriptions Provided by Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC)
