In 1807, the United States experienced a year of remarkable progress and change, reflecting a time of innovation that significantly contributed to shaping the future of the nation.
Among these developments, a notable leap forward in urban infrastructure emerged with the introduction of gas lighting in Baltimore. This groundbreaking advancement positioned Baltimore as the first American city to illuminate its streets with gas lights, setting a precedent that would revolutionize urban environments across the country. The adoption of gas lighting marked a significant departure from traditional oil lamps and candles, offering a brighter, more reliable source of light. This innovation dramatically transformed the nocturnal landscape of cities, making streets safer and more navigable at night. The impact on public safety was immediate, as well-lit streets discouraged crime and made evening activities more feasible for citizens, contributing to a vibrant night-time economy. Furthermore, the extended hours of light allowed businesses to operate longer into the evening, boosting productivity and fostering a culture of bustling city life that extended beyond the limitations of natural daylight.
Beyond its practical applications, the introduction of gas lighting in Baltimore symbolized the onset of modern urban living. It reflected the United States' embrace of technological advancements and its willingness to invest in infrastructure improvements that enhanced the quality of life for its urban dwellers. This pioneering move was not just about lighting streets; it was a declaration of the country's forward-looking vision, signaling a commitment to innovation and progress. The successful implementation of gas lighting in Baltimore catalyzed the widespread adoption of this technology in other cities, paving the way for the electrification of America and the eventual emergence of the modern cityscape.
This transformative period in 1807, highlighted by the advent of gas lighting, exemplified the United States' capacity for innovation and adaptation. It marked a significant milestone in the evolution of urban infrastructure, demonstrating how technological advancements could reshape societal norms and expectations. The shift towards gas lighting was a key moment in the broader narrative of American progress, reflecting a society in transition and eager to embrace the possibilities of a new era in urban development.
(1796-1807)
At no other time in American history was the one cent coin so important as it was in the closing years of the 18th century. Although cumbersome, the large copper coins were useful for very small transactions, unlike the wide variety of foreign coins then in circulation. Yet the Mint’s ability to create dies and procure quality copper for these vital coins was hampered by inadequate machinery, inexperienced employees and lack of funds, not to mention frequent epidemics of yellow fever. It often cost more to produce a coin than its face value. Though these failings could be explained as the growing pains of a new enterprise, Congress on several occasions almost gave up on the business of making coins and considered turning the matter over to private companies.
The young Mint was frequently attacked as inefficient. Actually, if one were to characterize the early years of the Philadelphia facility, the words “blunder” and “disaster” might come to mind. Along with a multitude of production difficulties, adequate supplies of copper were also a problem. The metal was mostly purchased in the form of planchets or blanks, but the domestic supply was inferior and resulted in dark, rough flans described as “black copper” by the Mint. Full of impurities, coins minted from this metal were of poor quality and wore rapidly. As a result, most of the copper supply had to be imported, primarily from the Boulton & Watt Company of Liverpool, England.
The denomination began with the design by Henry Voight in 1793, a flowing haired Liberty with a chain of fifteen links on the reverse. Almost immediately, objections were raised to the chain design, as it symbolized slavery and domination rather than the image of unity that Voight intended. A wreath quickly took its place. Later in 1793, Joseph’s Wright’s Liberty Cap design, borrowed from Dupré’s Libertas Americana medal, replaced the wild haired Liberty of the earlier pieces. Both Robert Scot and John Smith Gardner contributed variations of this design until a new motif was adopted in July of 1796.
Scot’s new Draped Bust design was modeled after a drawing by artist Gilbert Stuart. It depicts Liberty with flowing hair, a ribbon behind her head and drapery at her neckline. The inscription LIBERTY is above the bust and the date below. The reverse features the denomination ONE CENT, encircled by an open wreath of two olive branches tied with a bow. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA surrounds the wreath, and the fraction 1/100 is between the ends of the bow.
There are three varieties of reverses; each varies the leaves and berries on the wreath. They are known as the “Type of 1794,” “Type of 1795” or “Type of 1797.” All three types were used on the reverse of 1796 cents, with the latter two types on the 1797. The last reverse remained constant on the dates through 1807.
Since the lettering was punched into the dies by hand, errors abound. Among these are blunders such as the “LIHERTY” error where the “B” was rotated 180 degrees before being punched and then crudely corrected, or the “T” over “Y” blunder in 1802. Other variations involve the spacing and positioning of the lettering and date. Reverse errors include the wrong fraction, 1/000; a corrected fraction; the 2nd “T” in STATES or the “U” in UNITED punched inverted, then corrected; a large fraction punched over a small fraction and a stemless wreath.
Over 16 million Draped Bust large cents were made between 1796 and 1807. Although replete with many scarce varieties, the series has one particularly rare date, 1799. First popularized by early 19th century collector Joseph Mickley’s search for his birth year coin, the 1799 issue has achieved fame among large cent devotees. Although the mintage was relatively high, they are elusive in all grades. One story relating to their short supply opines that thousands of 1799 dated cents destined for tribal chiefs in exchange for slaves were lost at sea while being shipped to Africa by a Salem, Massachusetts company.
Because coin collecting wasn’t popular until the 1850’s, coins of this era were typically saved by mere chance. When copper was scarce or very high-priced, craftsmen or others who worked with the metal would buy kegs of copper cents to melt. The large cents also found use as home medical remedies, hotel key fobs and mechanical devices. Notched large cents were also used as a means of identification for runaway slaves on the way north.
Some unopened kegs survived and became the source of uncirculated specimens. One group of survivors came from a bag of one thousand pieces bought by Senator Benjamin Goodhue for his daughters around 1798. Preserved for several generations, they were sold in 1863 by David Nichols of Gallows Hill, near Salem, Massachusetts. Most of the Mint State cents from 1796-97 come from this “Nichols Hoard.”
As the popularity of coin collecting grew, a cottage industry developed both on and off the Mint premises to reproduce scarce dates. Around 1858, the rare date 1804 Draped Bust cent was “restruck” in copper using dies sold as scrap metal by the Mint. These restrikes can easily be distinguished from the originals as they exhibit evidence of tooling to correct flaws in the badly rusted dies. Other restrikes and uniface examples of this date are known in white metal.
Large cent specialists often try to acquire as many varieties as possible. The guide for this endeavor is in the works of Dr. William H. Sheldon, Early American Cents and the update published in 1958 called Penny Whimsy. General collectors seek large cents by design type. A representative collection would include only seven coins: The Chain cent of 1793, the Wreath cent of 1793, the Liberty Cap (1793-96), the Draped Bust (1796-1807), the Classic Head (1808-1814), the Coronet Head (1816-1839) and the Braided Hair (1839-57).
Draped Bust large cents suffer from some of the peculiar characteristics and problems of early coins. It is not unusual to see clipped planchets and uneven striking. Often the denomination ONE CENT is very weak, even on uncirculated pieces.
When grading this design, the points to first show wear on the obverse are the hair above the forehead, the hair above the ear and shoulder and the lines of the draped bustline. On the reverse, look for wear on the leaves of the olive branches and the knot of the ribbon.
The Draped Bust design was replaced in 1808 with the introduction of the “Classic Head” motif by the new Second Engraver, John Reich. The new design was concurrent with an improvement in die steel allowing, for the first time, an unprecedented 300,000 impressions per working die.
Coin Descriptions Provided by Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC)
